🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."