🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.