🔗 Share this article

In my role as a Dungeon Master, I usually avoided heavy use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I tended was for the plot and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice as opposed to random chance. That said, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very glad I did.

The Catalyst: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

A popular podcast features a DM who often requests "fate rolls" from the players. He does this by picking a type of die and defining potential outcomes contingent on the roll. It's at its core no unlike rolling on a random table, these are created in the moment when a course of events has no clear conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own game, primarily because it appeared novel and offered a change from my standard routine. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated tension between pre-determination and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful Session Moment

At a session, my party had concluded a large-scale conflict. Afterwards, a cleric character asked about two friendly NPCs—a pair—had made it. Rather than choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a incredibly poignant scene where the characters found the corpses of their companions, still holding hands in their final moments. The party performed last rites, which was particularly significant due to previous roleplaying. In a concluding reward, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously transformed, showing a spell-storing object. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was exactly what the group lacked to address another pressing situation. One just script these kinds of serendipitous moments.

Honing DM Agility

This experience made me wonder if randomization and making it up are actually the beating heart of D&D. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Players often take delight in derailing the best constructed plots. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to adapt swiftly and invent details on the fly.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to train these abilities without going completely outside your usual style. The trick is to use them for low-stakes situations that don't fundamentally change the campaign's main plot. As an example, I wouldn't use it to decide if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I could use it to determine whether the PCs reach a location right after a critical event unfolds.

Empowering Shared Narrative

This technique also works to make players feel invested and create the feeling that the adventure is responsive, shaping based on their choices as they play. It prevents the feeling that they are merely characters in a DM's sole script, thereby enhancing the shared foundation of roleplaying.

Randomization has always been embedded in the original design. The game's roots were reliant on charts, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. Although current D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the only path.

Achieving the Right Balance

There is absolutely no issue with doing your prep. However, equally valid no issue with relinquishing control and permitting the whim of chance to guide minor details rather than you. Control is a significant part of a DM's role. We require it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to release it, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of recommendation is this: Do not fear of temporarily losing control. Try a little randomness for minor story elements. You might just create that the organic story beat is infinitely more powerful than anything you could have scripted in advance.